Bereich: Arbeit & Chancengleichheit

The Austrian policy landscape with regard to the educational integration measures directly or indirectly targeting migrant children is characterized by inconsistency and the concurrence of integrative andsegregative measures. We ask how these discrepancies can be interpreted without being reduced to mere inconsistencies and why, in the context of the ongoing normalization of the political right, integrative measures have not (yet) disappeared completely. Based on interviews with experts, we identify three distinct – integrative, multicultural, and segregative – hegemony projects pursued by different social forces through various discursive and institutional strategies. The integrative hegemony project seeks social redistribution through comprehensive, rights-based measures; the multicultural project seeks to promote recognition for cultural diversity; and the segregative hegemony project seeks to re-signify integration through mechanisms of assessment, discipline and control. Although our sample is limited in terms of representation, our research speaks to the ongoing societal contestation over the means and meaning of integration.

Dursun, A., Wolter, S., Liepold, M., Buschmann, D., Sauer, B. (2022). Contested Integration: Hegemony Projects in the Field of Education in Austria. Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2149582

AutorInnen: Wolter, S., Ayse Dursun, Mira Liepold, Dovaine Buschmann, Birgit Sauer

Downloads:

Verwandte Artikel:

• Publikation: Datensatz "Befragung von Schüler*innen an Wiener Schulen" und "Interviews mit Lehrer*innen an Wiener Schulen"
• News: Auch Kinder haben was zu sagen
• Publikation: Waiting in the Austrian asylum system: The well-being of asylum-seeking children in a phase of liminality