Citizen Science is widely understood as a participatory way of doing research.
Its tradition goes back to the 18th and 19th century and has its origin in areas like astronomy, ornithology and meteorology. A historical view on the development of science shows that the paid profession of scientist was only established in the late 19th century. Until then, scientific engagement was mostly a voluntary undertaking of individuals with a scientific spirit and access to necessary resources.
With the upcoming of the Internet and related technologies that allow fast communication and collaboration independent of time and location Citizen Science has gained a new momentum. In this new wave of public science participation the actual term „Citizen Science“ was coined in 1995, and especially popularised by Alan Irwin and Rick Bonney. Despite the great interest and increasing number of Citizen Science activities, or perhaps because of it, there has not been an agreement on a commonly accepted single definition. We rather see a serious of definitions that evolve over time and reflect the evolutions in scale and scope that this approach is taking over the years.
The variety of definitions and differences in interpretation of what Citizen Science encompasses reflects the dynamics of the field. Citizen Science comprises a wide array of activities and approaches that link the public with scientific research. Citizen scientists perform societally relevant as well as fundamental research activities and projects mainly differ in the way and the intensity the public is involved. We see Citizen Science projects being developed completely independently by individual volunteers’ initiatives, next to collaborative trans-disciplinary work following formalised instructions and guidance provided by scientific facilities. The diversity of Citizen Science cannot be reduced to a single exemplary project or proxy. The type of scientific work and geographic scale of participation strongly shape the strategic path a project has to take to meet its goals. The range of types of participation, social opportunities, technologies in use, approaches to data validation, ways to measure contribution, and project goals that we encounter today in Citizen Science is impressive.
ZSI has approached Citizen Science from a theoretical and practical side: from co-authoring the White Paper on Citizen Science and the development of an evaluation framework for Citizen Science to co-designing Citizen Science actions for environmental monitoring or Citizen Social Science.
Contact person: Dr. Barbara Kieslinger
Attachments:
Related Articles:
Cooperation Partners
Projects
- iNNOvative SEDiment management in the Danube River Basin
- STone monument Ensambles and the Climate Change Impact
- deVEloping scientific Research with ethIcs and inTegritY
- InChildHealth
- Beirat "Foresight & Citizens" der FTI-Task Force Arbeitsgruppe "EU-Missionen"
- show more ..
Publications
- Citizen science, accessibility, art & science, critical thinking, policy and engagement: thoughts and lessons learned from the REINFORCE experience
- Policy Brief: Citizen Social Science: a promising approach for more participation in knowledge production and decision making
- Transformation messen und verstehen: partizipative Evaluationsansätze für Citizen Science
- Participatory Evaluation and Impact Assessment in Citizen Science
- ‘Hard to reach’ or ‘easy to ignore’. Strategies and reflections on including co-researchers
- show more ..
Events
- ZSI focus session at ECSA
- Science and Technology Studies and Citizen Science Colloquium
- Katja Mayer Keynote at ECSA Conference on "Participatory Turns: ...
- Step Change at the ECSA Conference
- The role of social innovation and the relevance of social sciences and humanities in EU missions
- show more ..